The Herald-Dispatch |


Hot Topics
Taxes. Litter. The cost of living. Anything that makes news in the Tri-State is worth a thought or two.

Thursday, March 20, 2008

Modern car design frustrates first responders?

TAMPA, Fla. (AP) — Capt. Clint Roberts makes his living cutting accident victims out of hideously mangled vehicles, but even he could hardly believe it when two people in a 2007 midsize car survived a head-on crash with a full-sized pickup last year.

The Ford Fusion’s reinforced steel construction probably saved the lives of the 18-year-old driver and his 16-year-old passenger. But Roberts said it gave his Hillsborough County Fire Rescue crew fits as they tried to free them last November.

Because hydraulic cutters couldn’t shear the roof posts, rescue workers had to turn to heavy-duty electric saws, replacing blade after blade as they dulled on the rugged material.

“It was just beating the snot out of the tools,” adding minutes and delaying medical treatment, Roberts said.

There is no question that today’s cars save lives by cocooning motorists in reinforced alloys, impact-absorbing crumple zones and as many as a dozen air bags.

But in interviews with The Associated Press, rescue officials and experts from around the United States said the new technology is also hindering extrication of injured people, increasingly forcing crews to work deeper into the critical “golden hour” between accident and treatment by emergency room doctors. On many 2005 and later cars, an extrication that once took 10 or 15 minutes can now take twice that or longer.

The AP article lists other problems. But I'm just happy that my 2005 car is a lot safer in an impact than my 1976 subcompact was.

I may have said this before, but . . .

A few months ago, I saw a Porsche 924 with a "For Sale" sign in the window in a parking lot along U.S. 60. I stopped to look at it. I figured it was a late 1970s model. No airbag, no antilock brake, probably no collapsing steering column, no good reinforced body panels or cumple zones ... and no interest by me in buying it.

I didn't have the money, but that's beside the point. I don't want to go back to 1970s engineering and design if that's what it takes to save a few miles per gallon.