One study shows the number of baby
boys being born compared to girls is declining. The study lists environmental pollutants as a possible cause, and from this report, that's understandable.
What is not mentioned -- and I don't know if this could ever be documented -- is the number of boy fetuses aborted in the US and Japan compared to the number of girl fetuses. Previous studies have shown that in some countries that value boys over girls -- China and India in particular -- parents tend to abort girl fetuses so they can have boys.
I'd better stop there before I write something that really gets me into trouble before I'm prepared for it.
+=+
Oh, great. Everyone gets excited about ethanol whenever the pump price of gasoline approaches $3, and now ethanol is linked to a health hazard. Check it out
here and
here.
+=+
I have never liked NBA officiating. A few years ago, I was at my mother-in-law's house, outside with the kids when someone watching a playoff game told me the Lakers were down by a large margin with less than a quarter to play. Don't worry, I said, the refs will make sure the Lakers win. And sure enough, they did.
A lot of game officials have a god complex. Yes, we should respect them, but we can't ignore the fact that some of them -- even at the high school level, as people in Huntington will attest -- do too much to influence the game. So it was good to see the NBA commissioner give a long-time ref the heave-ho for being a jerk.
If you want an analysis, try this piece by
Michael Wilbon.
+=+
Today the Supreme Court released a ruling upholding a federal ban on the procedure known as partial-birth abortion. You can read an AP story on it
here.
I was surprised at the outcome, but I was also surprised at the language used by the AP writer. I'm not used the the words that the writer used being found in a national story about abortion. To wit:
The procedure at issue involves partially removing the fetus intact from a woman’s uterus, then crushing or cutting its skull to complete the abortion.
Abortion opponents say the law will not reduce the number of abortions performed because an alternate method — dismembering the fetus in the uterus — is available and, indeed, much more common.
That language is pretty brutal, but it does fit with what we've all read about this procedure, which the medical community apparently refers to as "dilation and extraction."
A story on the Washington Post Web site has only one paragraph describing the procedure, but its language is not as grusome as the AP's. In fact, that paragraph quotes from the court opinion.
The story on the New York Times site uses this language to describe the procedure:
"It involves partly removing an intact fetus, then destroying the skull to complete the abortion."I prefer the language used in the AP article. It's not polite, but if accurate it describes the procedure and why so many people want it banned.
The part about dismemberment makes me wonder why more wire and national stories don't use that word. Is it inaccurate, or does it play into a news reporter or organization's biases?
You tell me.
+=+
A later AP story uses this language:
The procedure is formally known as dilation and extraction and is also referred to as late term abortion, D&X or Intact D&X. It involves dilating the cervix and removing the fetus.Much less emotional, isn't it?
That was in a sidebar. The latest version of the mainbar had the original language.