Small cars
There's a lot of talk about requiring automakers to build cars that are more fuel-efficient. Part is energy conservation and part is anti-global warming.
When I hear that talk, I think back to all the small cars Detroit built in the 1970s as the market wanted smaller, more fuel-efficient cars. They were -- I don't know if I should use the word, but it rhymes with "trap."
A few months ago, my family was on U.S. 60 when I saw a late 1970s Porsche 924 sitting in a retail store parking lot. The Porsche had a "For Sale" sign on it, so I had to stop. As I looked at it, I got to thinking about that small 1976 Ford I once owned. The sheet metal was thin. There were no crash crumple zones engineered into the frame. No airbag. No antilock brakes. I wouldn't want one of my kids driving one of those things. But I was young and idealistic and cheap, so I did. At one time I wanted a Porsche 924, but no more.
If there is to be tradeoff between user safety and fuel efficiency, I'll go with safety every time. I get the feeling Detroit and Tokyo think there are a lot of people out here like me. That's why SUVs and CUVs and minivans still sell, although maybe not in the same numbers as before. If I go back to a small car, it will be because I'm usually alone in it and I'm driving on roads safe for small cars.
And if a small car is as affordable as a larger one.
Global warming will play a very, very small role when I go car shopping again.