Huntington’s downtown commercial renewal is continuing, and that certainly is critical to Huntington's future. However, one of our blog participants, Michelle, posted comments on the “Hot Topics” blog by Editorial Page Editor, Jim Ross, which has given Jim and me, and many of our blog participants, pause to reflect on her insightful comments.
Let us all pause and give serious thought to her reasoning about the changed "tone" of our community. Some of Michelle's excellent points (edited):
(1) Things changed in Huntington, and I do not really know what happened, nor can I pinpoint when it happened. It was before crime became a huge issue. It was even before abandoned buildings and homes became a problem. Huntington just slowly morphed from an actually beautiful city to a neglected city, and it was a slow process. I just wish I could pinpoint where the change occurred.
(2) I do recall all of the constant conflicts that suddenly began between council and the mayor...the “tone” changed in leadership. The focus was not on the people anymore...and it became obvious, to me anyway, that politics had taken over. Once that happens...well...it is not good. THAT was when Huntington truly started deteriorating.
(3) People want to blame it on the interstate, or on crime, on the abandoned properties that lower the values of surrounding homes...but it seems to me that those things are the result of a government that failed to keep it's focus where it should have been. After that, the citizens got caught up in the debates and lost their focus as well.
(4) Unfortunately, the public loses its focus quite easily. Unfortunately, maybe things were just too comfortable for too long, and so maybe there has to be a decline at some point before things get better again. What worries me, for our city, is that the mentality of “ownership” is different than it used to be. The mentality of “community” is different. It seems to me that the city government must start offering a return on the investment made by its citizens.
(5) The on-going debate over the user fee for needed street paving, and the valid complaints people made about having already PAID for what was supposed to be used for street-paving, is only one example of actions taken by our leaders that cause the people not to trust our city government? If our city government would stop lying and taking advantage of people's already stretched incomes, then, yes, I really do think more people would be very happy living in town, instead of desperately trying to sell so they can get out.
Again, the above edited points made by Michelle are very insightful. Michelle and many of our citizens truly believe this:
Together, we can do anything we can imagine … Together!If you care to read all of Michelle's thoughts, click here:
https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=24933557&postID=427365907755698259